کنکاش نظریه معماری سازه‌پذیر با استفاده از نظریه‌پردازی داده‌بنیاد

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری فناوری معماری، دانشکده معماری، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

2 استاد گروه فناوری معماری، دانشکده معماری، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران (نویسنده مسئول).

10.22034/aaud.2023.297782.2522

چکیده

به منظور تلفیق و هماهنگی سازه و معماری در آفرینش معماری سازه‌پذیر، سوال اساسی این است که آیا می‌توان عوامل تاثیرگذار در این معماری و جایگاه هر یک از این عوامل را شناسایی نمود؟ بدین منظور در این مقاله کنکاش "نظریه معماری سازه‌پذیر" با استفاده از روش پژوهش نظریه‌پردازی داده بنیاد، به منظور روشن شدن شرایط علّی، شرایط مداخله‌گر، شرایط زمینه، راهبرد و پیامد معماری سازه‌پذیر دنبال می‌شود. نتیجه مستخرج از این مقاله نشان می‌دهد که برای طراحی معماری سازه‌پذیر، حصول شرایط علّی با خصیصه‌هایی نظیر علم‌گرایی و خرد نقادانه، رویکرد اساسی می‌باشد. همچنین شرایط مداخله‌گر در این معماری، زمینه تکتونیکی شامل؛ توان اجرایی، مسائل اقتصادی، زمین و همجواری‌ها، کاربری بنا، بوم و هویت بومی و اقلیم، فرهنگ و هماهنگی با زمانه و مقیاس بنا هستند که بر شرایط زمینه یا صفات تکتونیکی در سه حوزه عملکردی، کالبدی و معنایی اثر مداخله‌ای دارند. این صفات در 18 خصیصه (نظیر: هوشمندی، ایمنی، انعطاف‌پذیری، استحکام و تعادل، بهینه بودن، توجه به جزئیات، تعریف فضا، الهام از طبیعت، توجه به نیازهای پس از بهره‌برداری، وحدت، ترکیب با زمینه، تراش نیرویی و فرم بهینه، هندسه، تناسبات با مقیاس، پیام‌دهندگی، زیبایی، سازگاری و پایداری) می‌گنجند. راهبرد معماری سازه‌پذیر منتج از مقاله در دو بخش بررسی و اقدام دسته‌بندی می‌شود. در بررسی تکتونیکی و مقوله‌های تحلیل و تصمیم، طراح ملزم به توجه به معماری بومی و معماری اکوتک می‌باشد و در اقدام تکتونیکی، استفاده از پداگوژی سازاگرا در آموزش معماری سازه‌پذیر با مولفه‌های متعدد نظیر الگوی اکتشافی و تفکر انتقادی و خلاق الزامی است. پیامد بهره‌مندی از معماری سازه‌پذیر در مولفه‌های متعدد نظیر ارتقای آرامش و آسایش در محیط زندگی است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Exploring the Theory of Structural Architecture Using Grounded Theory

نویسندگان [English]

  • Maryam Ghorbanzadeh 1
  • Mahmood Golabchi 2
1 Ph.D. Candidate of Architectural Technology, Faculty of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
2 Professor of Architectural Technology, Faculty of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran (Corresponding Author).
چکیده [English]

A key question is raised in the case of integrating and matching structure and architecture when creating structural architecture: is it possible to identify factors affecting this architecture and the status of these factors? For this purpose, this study explores the "theory of structural architecture" using grounded theory to reveal the causal, intervening, and context conditions, as well as the strategy and consequence of structural architecture. The results of this study show that the underlying approach for the design of structural architecture is to obtain causal conditions with some attributes, such as scientism and critical wisdom. Moreover, intervening conditions in this architecture includes tectonic background including executive power, economic issues, land and adjacencies, building use, ecology and vernacular identity and climate, culture, and coordination with time and building scale that have intervening effect on the context conditions or tectonic features within three functional, Formal, and semantic or meaning fields. These attributes include 18 features: smartness, safety, flexibility and resilience, strength and balance, optimality, paying attention to details, the definition of space, inspired by nature, paying attention to post-operational requirements, unity, combined with context, force cutting and optimal form, geometry, scale-based proportions, conveying a message, beauty, consistency, and stability. The structural architecture strategy derived from this study is divided into two parts of survey and action. In tectonic surveys and categories of analysis and decision, the designer must pay attention to vernacular architecture and ecology architecture, while it is essential in tectonic or tectonic action to use constructive pedagogy in structural architecture instruction based on various components, including exploratory model, critical and creative thinking. The consequence of structural architecture can be seen in different components, such as improved peace and comfort in the living environment.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Theory of Structural Architecture
  • Tectonical Approach
  • Tectonical Context
  • Tectonical Features
  • Tectonical Action
  • Constructive Pedagogy
Addis, Bill. 2008. Building: 3000 years of design engineering and construction. New York: phaidon press.
Baghaei, Ajang. 2009. The role of structure in the Aestheticsof contemporary architecture. Journal of City identity 4(3). https://sid.ir/paper/154687/fa. [in Persian]
Ahmadnejad Karimi, Majid, Mahdi Mahmoodi, and Maryam Azimi. 2018. Aspects and limits of structural knowledge in the process of architectural design. Journal of Soffeh 81(29): 19-32. https://sid.ir/paper/94464/fa. [in Persian]
Akrami, Gholamreza. 2003. “Review and compare architectural training in accordance with procedural model From Lang’s point of view, with the training of traditional architecture in Iran.” In Proceedings of the second conference on architectural education, 2003. Tehran: University of Tehran. [in Persian]
Alaei, Ali, and Malihe Rahimi. 2013. “Structure, Architecture, beauty.” In Proceedings of the 1st National Conference on Design and Nature, 2013. Natanz. [in Persian]
Alami, Babak, Shahram Purdeihimi, and Saeid Mashayekh Faridani. 2016. Structure, Form & Architecture. Journal of Iranian Architectural Studies 9. https://www.magiran.com/paper/1585772. [in Persian]
Allen, Edward. 2005. How Buildings work? The Natural order of Architecture. London: Oxford University Press.
Allen , Zalewski and Boston Structures Group. 2010. XIV.
Angel, Heino. 1998. Structure Systems. Translated by Ali Golsurat. Tehran: Karang Press. .[in Persian]
Ansari, Mojtaba, Aryan Amirkhani, and Haniyeh Okhovvat. 2009. Evaluating the growth rate of architectural engineering students in learning structural concepts by using nature and comparing it with other common methods. Journal of Iran Engineering Education 42(11):59-80. https://doi.org/10.22047/ijee.2008.631. [in Persian]
Baker, Geoffrey H. 1996. Design Strategies in Architecture: An Approach to the Analysis of Form. London: Taylor & Francis press.
Baghaei, Ajang. 2001. Technology and globalization of architectural culture. Journal of Architecture & Culture 11:9-15. https://www.sid.ir/paper/432336/fa. [in Persian]
Bani Masud, Amir. 2014. Western Architecture, Roots and Consepts. Tehran: Honare Memari press. [in Persian]
Charleson, Andrew. 2012. Structure as Architecture. Translated by Mahmood Golabchi and Ehsan Sorushnia, E., Tehran: University of Tehran Press .[in Persian]
Ching, Frank (Francis D.K.). 2009. Structure in Architecture. Translated by Mohammad reza Afzali. Tehran: Yazda Press. [in Persian]
Clark, Roger H., and Michael Pause. 2003. Precedents in Architecture: Analytic Diagrams, Formative Ideas, and Partis. Translated by Samar Torabi. Tehran: Yazda Press. [in Persian]
Creswell, John W. 2005. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative Qualitative Research. Boston: Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data.
Danaeifard, Hasan, Seyed Mahdi Alvani, and Adel Azar. 2004. Qualitative research methodology in management: a comprehensive approach. Tehran: Saffar Press. [in Persian]
Danaeifard, Hasan, and Seyyed Mojtaba Emami. 2007. Qualitative research strategies: Reflection on Grounded Theory. Journal of Management Thought 2(1):69-97. http://ensani.ir/file/download/article/20120325151825-1040-10.pdf. [in Persian]
Daneshgar moghadam, Golrokh. 2007. “Nature lessons in creating harmony of architecture and structure”. In Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Structure and Architecture, 2007. Tehran: University of Tehran. https://civilica.com/doc/17394/. [in Persian]
Dehkhoda, Ali Akbar 1998. Dehkhoda Dictionary. Tehran: University of Tehran Press. [in Persian]
Eghbali, Seyed Rahman, and Farzane Asadi. 2007. “A re-approach to the coherence and correlation of form and structure in architecture”. In Proceedings of the first conference on structures and architecture, Tehran, 2007. University of Tehran. https://civilica.com/doc/17377/. [in Persian]
Eizadpanah, Farzin. 2011. “Advantages of the constructivist approach compared to the deductive approach in teaching structure in architecture”. In Proceedings of the International Conference on structures and architecture, 2007. Tehran: University of Tehran. https://civilica.com/doc/119296/. [in Persian]
Fardanesh, Hashem. 1999. A Critical Comparison of systematic and constructive Approaches to Instructional Design. Modarres humanities Quarterly 3(3): 139-149. http://ensani.ir/fa/article/233608/. [in Persian]
Fardanesh, Hashem. 2008. Classification of constructive design patterns based on learning and teaching approaches. Journal of Educational and psychological studies 2. http://ensani.ir/fa/article/42094/. [in Persian]
Fardanesh, Hashem. 2019. Instructional Design, Foundations, Approaches and Applications, Organization for the study and compilation of humanities books in universities. Tehran: Samt Press. [in Persian]
Falahat, Mohammad Sadegh, and Maryam Kalami. 2007. “Structure and formation of architectural space”. In Proceedings of the International Conference on structures and architecture, 2007. Tehran: University of Tehran. https://civilica.com/l/3233/. [in Persian]
Farshad, Mahdi. 1974. Building forms. Shiraz: University of Shiraz Press.[in Persian]
Gauthier, Clermont, and Maurice Tardif. 2020. La Pedagogie, Theories et Pratiques de lantiquite a nos jours Organization for the study and compilation of humanities books in universities. Translated by Farideh Mashayekh. Tehran: Samt Press.[in Persian]
Giedion, Sigfried. 1967. Space, time and architecture: the growth of a new tradition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Golabchi, Mahmood, and Mojtaba Amiri. 2017. Structural Elements for Architects. Tehran: University of Tehran Press. [in Persian]
Golabchi, Mahmood. 2007. “The role of structural systems in the formation of architectural effect”. In Proceedings of the International Conference on structures and architecture, 2007. Tehran: University of Tehran. https://civilica.com/doc/17405/. [in Persian]
Golabchi, Mahmood. 2003. Architectural form systematizing structure. Journal of Architecture & Urbanism 74 & 75:8-17. https://www.magiran.com/volume/8853. [in Persian]
Golabchi, Mahmood. 2009. “Architecture training in civil engineering: Today’s challenges, future necessities”. In Proceedings of the International Engineering Education Conference in 1404, 2009. Tehran: Academy of Sciences. https://civilica.com/doc/61496/. [in Persian]
Grutter, Jorg Kurt. 2004. A sthetik der Architektur: Grundlagen der Architektur-Wahrnehmung, c1987. Translated by Jahanshah Pakzad, and Abd Al reza Homayun. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University Press.[in Persian]
Haghighi, Saeid, Omid Dejdar, and Nayereh Dehghan. 2020. Learning the design of new structures: both temporal and spatial approaches to enhance the ability to design architecture. Journal of Armanshahr 33:57-74. https://doi.org/10.22034/aaud.2019.165436.1771. [in Persian]
Haghir, Saeed, and Hamed Kamelnia. 2016. Theory of Modernity in Architecture. Tehran: University of Tehran Press. [in Persian]
Hashemnejad, Hashem, and Sara Soleimani. 2007. The necessity of harmonizing structure and architecture in contemporary architecture. Journal of Fine Arts 30: 23-30. https://journals.ut.ac.ir/article_18060_1770.html. [in Persian]
Hashempoor, Rahim. 2011. “Red line and common points of architecture and structures”. In Proceedings of the 2th International Conference on Architecture and Structures, 2007. Tehran: University of Tehran. https://civilica.com/doc/119288/. [in Persian]
Heidari, Shahin. 2018. Introduction to Research Method in Architecture. Tehran: Fekr-e- No Press. [in Persian]
Hoseini, Hannan Sadat. 2019. “Investigating the effective factors in structural coordination of structure and architecture based on multi-criteria decision making”. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Technology Development Conference and International Conference on New Findings in Civil Engineering, Architecture and Construction Industry. 2019. Tehran. https://civilica.com/doc/1031273/. [in Persian]
Hushyar, Leila, and Hushyar Barugh. 2013. “Investigating the concept of form in contemporary architecture and urban planning”. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Civil Engineering, Architecture and Sustainable Development. 2013. Tabriz. https://civilica.com/doc/273511/. [in Persian]
Jafari rad, Azade, and Paria Asadi. 2017. “The role of structures in the aesthetic aspects of architecture”. In Proceedings of the 2th International Conference on New Horizons in Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urban Planning and Cultural Management of Cities. 2017. Tehran. https://civilica.com/doc/733084/. [in Persian]
Javaherian, Mehrdad. 2007. “Structure in Architecture”. In Proceedings of the International Conference on structures and architecture, 2007. Tehran: University of Tehran. https://elmnet.ir/article/20233078-22991/. [in Persian]
Lang, Jon. 2014. Creating Architectural Theory: The Role of the Behavioral Sciences in Environmental Design. Translated by Alireza Einifar. Tehran: University of Tehran Press. [in Persian]
Lee, Jinyoul. 2001. A Grounded Theory: Integration and Internalization in ERP Adoption and Use. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Nebreska: University of Nebreska, In Proquest UMI Database.
MacDonald, Angus J. 2013. Structure and Architecture. Translated by Mohammad Ahmadinejad. Tehran: Khak Press. [in Persian]
Mahdavinejad, Mohammad Javad. 2016. In Search of Outstanding Architecture: The Capacities of Contemporary Iranian Architecture to Become a Legacy for the Future. Journal of Armanshahr 17: 129-138. https://www.sid.ir/paper/202377/fa. [in Persian]
Mahdavinejad, Mohammad Javad. 1996. The World Architectural Theories. Tehran, Jahad Institue, University of Tehran. https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/. [in Persian]
Maleki, Hasan. 2014. An Introduction to curriculum Planning. Tehran: Samt Press. [in Persian]
Mardomi, Karim, Mahdi Soheilifard, and Majid Aghaazizi. 2015. Alignment of structure and architecture in order to optimally locate the supports by genetic algorithm method Case study of free form overlays designed based on Iranian knot geometry. Journal of Naghsh e Jahan 5(2): 65-75. https://bsnt.modares.ac.ir/article-2-7894-fa.html. [in Persian]
Moin, Mohammad. 2007. Moin Dictionary. 6-volume collection. Tehran: Amirkabir Press. [in Persian]
Mohammadzadeh gudini, Yahya, Ehsan Akbari, and Leila Babazade. 2017. “Structure and space in the process of architectural design: an essential union”. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urban Development, 2017.Tehran: Shahid beheshti University. https://civilica.com/doc/735007/. [in Persian]
Molanaei, Salah aldin, and Meisam Feizi. 2013. “An approach to creating convergence between structure and architecture”. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Urban Development, 2013. Sanandaj: Islamic Azad University. https://civilica.com/doc/300436/. [in Persian]
Momeni, Maryam, and Azita Etminani. 2013. “Pathology of the interaction of architects and structural engineers in the academic education of contemporary architecture”. In Proceedings of the 1st Natanz National Conference on the Model of Islamic Architecture and Urban Planning on the 1404, 2013. Natanz. https://civilica.com/doc/267560/. [in Persian] 
Moore, Fuller. 2001. Understanding Structures. Translated by M. Golabchi. Tehran: University of Tehran Press. [in Persian]
Motarjem, Yalda, and Amir Abbas Naghshineh. 2013. “The position of structural design in the planning process in architecture and the need to match the two”. In Proceedings of the 1st National Conference on Architecture, Restoration, Urban Planning and Sustainable Environment, 2013. Tehran. https://civilica.com/doc/263517/. [in Persian]
Mirzabeigi, Ali. 2011. Curriculum Planning and Lesson Plan in Formal Education and Human Resource Training. Tehran: Yastoroon Press. [in Persian]
Norberg-Schulz, Christian. 1965. Intentions in Architecture. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Oxford Languages. 2010. Oxford Dictionary. London: Oxford University Press.
Otto, Frei, and Bodo Rasch. 2001. Finding Forms. Stamford: Edition axel Menges Press.
Panahi, Sedigheh, Farhad Alizade, and Shahram Sheykhzade. 2013. “The effect of structuralism on the evolution of architectural space”. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Urban Development, 2013. Tabriz. https://civilica.com/doc/273716/. [in Persian]
Pandit, Naresh R. 1996. The Creation of Theory: A Recent Applicatioa of the Grounded Theory Method. The Qualitative Report 2(4). http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR2-4/pandit.bm 
Read, Herbert Edward. 1995. The meaning of art. London: Scientific and cultural Press.
Saif, Ali Akbar. 2007. Educational psychology: psychology of learning and Instruction. Tehran: Agah Press.
Salama, Ashraf. 2005. “Skill-Based/Knowledge-Based Architectural Pedagogies: An argument for Creating Human environment”. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human Habitat-ICHH, 2005. Mumbai. https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/52391
Salvadori, Mario George. 2000. Structural Design in Architecture. Translated by Mahmood Golabchi. Tehran: University of Tehran Press. [in Persian]
Sanaei, Sepide, and Amin Ghasemi. 2013. “The effect of coordination of structure with idea and form in architecture”. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Civil Engineering, Architecture and Sustainable Urban Development, 2013. Tabriz. https://civilica.com/doc/273305/. [in Persian]
Schon, Donald. 1987. Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Boss Press.
Shakeri, Mohammad Javad. 2017. “Investigating the role of technology in creating interaction between structure and architectural space”. In Proceedings of the 5th International Congress on Civil engineering, Architecture and Urban Development. 2017. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University. https://civilica.com/doc/735961/. [in Persian]
Seyedian, Seyyed Ali, and Mansura Baftyegane. 2007. “Planning in the process of architectural design with the approach of unity and coordination of structure and space”, In Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Structure and Architecture 2007. Tehran: University of Tehran. https://civilica.com/doc/17359/. [in Persian]
Sherbaf, Asem, and Mojtaba Ansari. 2017. “Common language of architecture and the art of structural engineering in Iranian architecture”. In Proceedings of the National conference of research and development in civil engineering, architecture and modern urban planning, Tehran 2017. Tehran. https://civilica.com/doc/723492/. [in Persian]
Soleimani, Sara, and Salahaldin Molanaei. 2017. Provide an efficient model for upgrading the structure to architecture students (with emphasis on reviewing the course content. Journal of Armanshahr 19(10): 23-33. http://www.armanshahrjournal.com/article_50334.html. [in Persian]
Strauss, Anselm, and Juliet Corbin. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. California: Sage Press.
Zarkesh, Afsane. 2005. Quality of training and professional work in creating harmony between space and structure in contemporary Western architecture. Journal of Fine Arts 23(23): 43-52. https://jhz.ut.ac.ir/article_10713.html. [in Persian]
Zarkesh, Afsane. 2002. Harmonization of space and structure in architecture. PhD Thesis in Architecture. Supervisor: Prof. Golabchi. Tehran: University of Tehran. [in Persian]
Zarkesh, Afsane. 2008. The precedence of architecture over structure in contemporary architecture. Journal of Book of the Month of Art 124: 20-31. https://www.magiran.com/paper/581904. [in Persian]
Zumthor, Peter. 2010. Thinking Architecture. Basel: Birkhäuser Architecture Press.