واکاوی قابلیت‌های حضورپذیری در فضاهای باز طبیعی موثر بر معیارهای گفتگومداری در پردیس‌های آموزشی-پژوهشی، مورد مطالعاتی: شهرستان لاهیجان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناسی ارشد گروه معماری، واحد لاهیجان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، لاهیجان، ایران.

2 ستادیار گروه معماری، واحد لاهیجان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، لاهیجان، ایران (نویسنده مسئول).

10.22034/aaud.2023.299967.2534

چکیده

پردیس دانشگاهی علاوه بر کارکرد اصلی خود به عنوان یک نهاد آموزشی- تحقیقاتی، تعاملات اجتماعی بین افراد را به دلیل نقش مهم آن در تقویت روابط مشارکتی که در نتیجه امکان گفتگوی آزاد شکل می‌گیرد، ترویج می‌نماید. در این میان براساس مطالعات پیشین به نظر می‌رسد بهره‌گیری از قابلیت‌های طبیعت می‌تواند در کیفیت حضور افراد در یک بستر اجتماعی نقش داشته و این نقش را می‌توان در بررسی اثرات متقابل طبیعت و محیط مصنوع جستجو نمود. از این رو پژوهش حاضر در پی آن است که ضمن تعریف مفهوم گفتگومداری در فرآیند رفتارهای تعاملی، به شاخص‌ها و راهبردهایی متاثر از حضور و تعامل با طبیعت دست یابد که ضامن برقراری فرآیند گفتگو با هدف تقویت سطح مشارکت‌پذیری کاربران در این مجموعه‌ها باشد. رویکرد پژوهش حاضر از نوع ترکیبی کیفی- کمی و روش پژوهش از نوع توصیفی- تحلیلی می‌باشد. در تحقیق حاضر تبیین ابعاد موثر بر اساس استدلال منطقی داده‌های حاصل از مرحله مطالعات کتابخانه‌ای انجام گرفت و جهت تایید روابط و آزمون فرضیات، داده‌های مرحله میدانی مستخرج از پرسش‌نامه محقق‌ساخته کاربران متخصص معمار در شهرستان لاهیجان می‌باشد. جهت تجزیه و تحلیل نظر متخصصان نیز از نرم‌افزار PLS بهره گرفته شده است. براساس یافته‌های پژوهش معناداری رابطه قابلیت‌های حضورپذیری در طبیعت در سه معیار بهبود سلامتی روانی، فیزیکی و اجتماعی با افزایش سطح گفتگومداری مورد تایید قرار گرفت. به‌طور کلی این مطالعه نشان می‌دهد که کیفیت، نحوه توزیع و مکان‌یابی محدوده‌های مرتبط با بستر طبیعی، از جنبه‌های مهمی است که به دلیل نقش حیاتی بر معیارهای گفتگومداری در راستای مشارکت‌پذیری در فرآیند یادگیری بین دانشجویان در طراحی پردیس‌های دانشگاهی باید مورد توجه قرار گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Analysis of Attendability in Natural Open Spaces Influencing Dialogue-Oriented Criteria in Educational-Research Campuses; Case Study: Lahijan County

نویسندگان [English]

  • Amir Noroozpour 1
  • Mahsa Delshad Siyahkali 2
1 M.A. of Department of Architecture, Lahijan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Lahijan, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor of Architecture, Lahijan branch, Islamic Azad University, Lahijan, Iran (Corresponding Author).
چکیده [English]

In addition to its main function as an education-research institute, the university campus promotes social interactions between individuals due to its important role in strengthening participative relationships created during free dialogues. According to previous studies, it seems that natural capabilities can enhance the quality of individuals present in a social platform, and this role can be found in the mutual effects of nature and the built environment. Hence, the present study aims to find some indicators and strategies influenced by the presence in and interaction with nature while defining the concept of dialogue orientation in engagement behaviors to ensure the dialogue process and improve the participation of users in such processes. The research approach is mixed qualitative-quantitative and the research method is descriptive-analytical. In this study, the effective dimensions were determined based on the logical argument of data obtained from library studies. To confirm the equations and test hypotheses, the data of the field phase were extracted from the researcher-made questionnaire filled out by the users who are architects in Lahijan County. The comments expressed by experts were analyzed through pls software. According to the obtained results, a significant nexus exists between attendability potentials within three criteria of improved mental, physical, and social health, and increased dialogue-orientation level. In general, this study shows that quality, distribution, and location of natural habitat-associated areas are substantial aspects that must receive great attention due to their vital roles in dialogue-orientation criteria regarding students' engagement in the learning process of designing university campuses.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Dialogue-Orientation
  • Attendability in Nature
  • Educational-Research Campus
  • Social Interactions
Al-Homoud, Majd, and Abu-Obeid Natheer. 2003. “UNIVERSITY OUTDOOR SPATIAL LAYOUT EFFECT ON PERCEPTION OF STUDENTS’ INTERACTION AND GROUP SECLUSION.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 20(3): 221-33. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43030661
Avila, Montero, and Mónica Inés. 2001. “Factors that Influence the Social Life and Vitality of Public Open Spaces in Maracaibo - Venezuela. Case Study: Plaza de la Madre and Plaza de la República.” Ph.D Thesis. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. https://theses.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-10292001-151807/unrestricted/01presentationpage.pdf
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1994. Dostoevsky’s Polyphonic Novel: A Plurality of Consciousness, In The Bakhtin Reader: Selected Writings of Bakhtin, Medvedev, Voloshinov. edited by Pam Morris, Bloomsbury Academic, London.
Behzadfar, Mostafa, and Payam Mahmudi Kordestani. 2010. “Qualitative Norms for Democratic Urban Spaces Design”. Armanshahr Journal of Architecture, Urban Design & Urban Planning 2(3): 32-48. http://www.armanshahrjournal.com/article_32590.html?lang [in Persian]
Behzadfar Mostafa, and Arsalan Tahmasebi. 2013. “Recognition and assessment of influential elements on social interaction (strengthening and improving citizen communication in urban open spaces, model city of Sanandaj)”. Bagh-e Nazar 10(25): 17-28. http://www.bagh-sj.com/article_2928.html?lang [in Persian]
Bisadi, Mona, Farhang Mozafar, and Baqer Hosseini. 2013. “Spatial Aspects of Public Areas Affecting the Researchers Creativity and Innovation in an Architecture and Urban Design Research Center Print”. Technology of Education Journal 7(2): 137-147. https://doi.org/10.22061/tej.2013.333 [in Persian]
Carmona, Matthew, Tim Heath, Taner Oc, and Steve Tiesdell. 2003. “Public places, urban spaces”. Oxford: Architectural Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080515427 
Chang, Mitchell J., Daria Witt, James Jones, and Kenji Hakuta. 2003. “Compelling interest: Examining the evidence on racial dynamics in colleges and universities”. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
Coley, Sullivan, William C., and Frances E. Kuo. 1997. “Where does community grow? The social context created by nature in urban public housing”. Environment and Behavior 29: 468-494. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391659702900402
Daneshgarmoghadam, Golrokh, Seyed Hossein Bahrainy, and Alireza Einifar,. 2011. “An Investigation on sociability of the spaces based on perception of nature in the built environment”. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba Memari-Va-Shahrsazi 3(45): 27-38. https://jfaup.ut.ac.ir/article_24682.html [in Persian]
Daneshpour, Abdolhadi, and Maryam Charkhchyan. 2007. “Public Spaces and Factors Affecting Collective Life”. Bagh-e Nazar 4(7): 19-28 http://www.bagh-sj.com/article_64.html?lang [in Persian]
Dober, Richard P. 2000. “Campus Landscape Function, Forms, Futures”. New York, John Wiley and Sons. 
Efroymson, Debra, and Ruhan Shama. 2009. “Making Cities More Liveable”. HealthBridge and WBB Trust.
Gehl, Jan. 2008. “Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space”. Translated by Shima Shasti, Academic Jihad Publishing Organization. [in Persian] 
Gurin, Patricia, Eric Dey, Sylvia Hurtado, and Gerald Gurin. 2002. “Diversity and higher education: Theory and impact on educational outcomes”. Harvard Educational Review 72(3): 330‐366. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.72.3.01151786u134n051
Hall, Edward T. 2008. “The Hidden Dimension”. Translated by Manochehr Tabibian. Tehran. University of Tehran Press. [in Persian]
Jacobs, Jane. 2008. “The Death and Life of Great American Cities”. Translated by Hamid Reza Parsi. Tehran: University of Tehran Press. [in Persian]
Kashani Jou, Khashayar. 2010. “Recognizing of Theoretical Trends in Relation to Urban Public Spaces”. Hoviat shahr 4(6): 95-106. https://hoviatshahr.srbiau.ac.ir/article_1126.html?lang [in Persian]
Harrington, Kim D. 2014. “Community on campus: The role of physical space”. PhD Dissertation, Georgia State University. https://doi.org/10.57709/4858208
Hanan, Himasari. 2013. “Open Space as Meaningful Place for Students in ITB Campus”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 85: 308-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.361
Hashimshony, Rifca, and Jacov Haina. 2006. “Designing the University of the Future”. Planning for Higher Education 34(2): 5-19. https://www.academia.edu/download/34604545/Designing_the_Future_University.pdf
Kasalı, Altuğ , and Fehmi Dogan. 2010. “Fifth-, sixth-, and seventh- grade students’ use of non-classroom spaces duringrecess: The case of three private schools in Izmir, Turkey”. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30(4): 518- 532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.03.008
Keniger, Lucy E., Kevin J. Gaston, Katherine N. Irvine, and Richard A. Fuller. 2013. “What are the benefits of interacting with Nature?”. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 10: 913-935. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10030913
Kenney, Daniel R., Ricardo Dumont, and Ginger Kenney. 2005. “Mission and place: Strengthening learning and community through campus design”. Westport CT, American Council on Education and Praeger Publishers.
Kingsley, Jonathan, and Mardie Townsend. 2006. “Dig in, to social capital: Community gardens as mechanisms for growing urban social connectedness”. Urban Policy and Research 24(4): 525-537. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111140601035200
Kuo, Frances E., and William C. Sullivan. 2001. “Environment and crime in the inner city: Does vegetation reduce crime”. Environment and Behavior 33(3): 343-367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916501333002 
Lau, Stephen Siu Yu, Zhonghua Gou, and Yajing Liu. 2014. “Healthy Campus by Open Space Design: Approaches and Guidelines”. Frontiers of Architectural Research 3(4): 452-467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2014.06.006
Lang, John. 2004. “Urban Design: A Typology of Procedures and Products”. Translated by Seyed Hossein Bahrainy, University of Tehran Press. [in Persian] 
Lang, John. 2005. “Creating Architectural Theory: The role of the Behavioural Sciences in Environmental Design”. Translated by Alireza Einifar, University of Tehran Press. [in Persian]
Lennard, Suzanne H. Crowhurst, and Henry L. Lennard. 1984. “Public life in urban places: social and architectural characteristics conducive to public life in European cities”. Gondolier PressImcl Council
Matloob Faris Ataallah, Ahmad Bashri Sulaiman, Turki Hasan Ali, Shuhana Shamsuddin, and Wan NurulMardyy. 2014. “Sustaining campuses through physical character: the role of landscape”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 140: 282-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.421
McFarland, Amy, and , T. M. Waliczek, and Jayne M. Zajicek. 2008. “The Relationship between Student Use of Campus Green Spaces and Perceptions of Quality of Life”. Hortechnology 18(2) :232-238. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.18.2.232
Moore, Megan, Mardie Townsend, and John Oldroyd. 2007. “Linking human and ecosystem health: The benefits of community involvement in conservation groups”. EcoHealth 3: 255-261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-006-0070-4
Munn, Norman L. 1987. “Principles of Psychology”. Translated by Mahmud Saatchi, Tehran. AmirKabir Publishing. [in Persian]
Mustafa, Faris Ali , and Maysa Danoon. 2020. “Effect of Common Outdoor Spaces on Social Interaction: The Case of College of Engineering Campus at Salahaddin University – Erbil, Iraq”. Journal of University of Babylon for Engineering Sciences 28(1): 229-238. (iasj.net)
Nagda, Biren, Patricia Gurin, Nicholas Sorensen, and Ximena Zúñiga. 2009. “Evaluating intergroup dialogue: Engaging diversity for personal and social responsibility”. Diversity & Democracy 12(1):4-6. http://igr.umich.edu/files/igr/Evaluating%20Intergroup%20Dialogue.pdf
Norberg-Schulz, Christian.2005. “Architecture: Presence, Language, Place”. Translated by Alireza Ahmadian. Tehran: Niloofar Press.
Poormohammadi, Mohammad Reza, and Roshan Kooshaneh. 2013. Evaluation and analysis of urban public spaces using TOPSIS model (Case Study : Tabriz). Journal of Urban - Regional Studies and Research 5(17): 37-52. http://urs.ui.ac.ir/article_20048.html?lang
Rastbin, Sajed, Yasser Jafari, Yasaman Daram, and Amir Mohammad Moazzezi Mehr. 2012. “Research on Relationship between Environmental Qualities and Continuation of Urban Life in Public Realm”. Bagh-e Nazar 9(21): 35-46. http://www.bagh-sj.com/article_1701.html?lang [in Persian]
Salama, Ashraf M. 2008. “When Good Design Intentions Do Not Meet User’s Expectations: Exploring Qatar University Campus Outdoor Spaces”. International Journal of Architectural Research 2(2): 57-77. https://doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v2i2.233
Sharghi, Ali. 2011. “Effects of University Campus Landscapes on Learning Quality of Students”. Bagh-e Nazar 8(18): 51-62. http://www.bagh-sj.com/article_463.html?lang [in Persian]
Shinew, Kimberly J., Troy D. Glover, and Diana C. Parry . 2004. “Leisure spaces as potential sites for interracial interaction: Community gardens in urban areas”. Journal of Leisure Research 36: 336-355. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2004.11950027
Shojaee, Delaram, and Parvin Partovi. 2015. “Analysis of Factors Affecting the Creation and Promotion of Sociability in Public Spaces in Different Scales of Tehran City (Case studies: Two Neighborhoods and an Area in District 7 Tehran)”. Bagh-e Nazar 12(34): 93-108. http://www.bagh-sj.com/article_11093.html?lang [in Persian] 
Speake, Janet, Sally Edmondson, and Haq Nawaz. 2013. “EVERYDAY ENCOUNTERS WITH NATURE: STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS AND USE OF UNIVERSITY CAMPUS GREEN SPACES”. Journal of Studies and Research in Human Geography 7(1): 21-31 https://doi.org/10.5719/HGEO.2013.71.21
Tanner, C. Kenneth. 2000. “The Influence Of School Architecture On Academic Achievement”. Journal of Educational Administration 38(4): 309-330. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230010373598
Torabi, Mohammad. 2012. “Neighborhood design based on the effect of physical characteristics of public open space in increasing interactions and social behavior”. Master Thesis, Tarbiat Dabir Shahid Rajaei University.
Valles-Planells, María, Francisco Galinan, and Veerle Van Eetvelde. 2014. “A Classification of landscape services to support local landscape planning”. Ecology and Society 19(1): 44. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-06251-190144
Westphal, Lynne M. 2003. “Urban greening and social benefits: A study of empowerment outcomes”. Journal of Arboriculture 29(3): 137-147. https://doi.org/10.48044/jauf.2003.017